Rule Clarifications: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 20:00, 22 July 2026

╔══════════════════════════════════════╗

VAULT-TEC RULE CLARIFICATIONS

ACCESS LEVEL: PUBLIC

╚══════════════════════════════════════╝
> Accessing administrative records...

> Loading directive interpretations...

> Verifying authorization signatures...

> Synchronizing clarification archive...



STATUS: RECORDS AVAILABLE
MISFITS: NUCLEAR WASTELAND

RULE CLARIFICATION ARCHIVE



This page contains official interpretations of server rules.

Clarifications explain how a rule applies to specific situations.




Clarifications do not replace the rules.

Players are expected to follow both the written rule and its official interpretations.

CLARIFICATION INDEX

6.3-A - What is a Diplomat
6.6-A - Destroying Walls and Doors Without /raid
7-A - New Life Rule Abuse

ACTIVE CLARIFICATIONS
Clarification 6.3-A — What is a Diplomat
ADMINISTRATIVE INTERPRETATION

DIRECTIVE 6.3 — What is a Diplomat
RECORD:
6.3-A

STATUS:
ACTIVE

ISSUED:
July 21, 2026

AUTHORIZED BY:
CEO
SUBMITTED QUESTION
What makes someone a diplomat
OFFICIAL CLARIFICATION
You preserve diplomatic immunity as long as both parties verbally confirm that you are a diplomat.

PERMITTED CONDUCT

Once diplomacy is over the diplomat must be free to go.



Clarification 7-A — New Life Rule Abuse
ADMINISTRATIVE INTERPRETATION

DIRECTIVE 7 — New Life Rule
RECORD:
7-A

STATUS:
ACTIVE

ISSUED:
July 22, 2026

AUTHORIZED BY:
COO
SUBMITTED QUESTION
Can a player kill and immediately revive another player to invoke the New Life Rule and erase what they witnessed?
OFFICIAL CLARIFICATION
No. Killing a player solely to wipe their memory is powergaming. Dialogue must come before lethal force. Lethal force is only appropriate when the information is substantial and verbal resolution is not a viable option.
PERMITTED CONDUCT

Attempting verbal resolution before escalating to lethal force.
Lethal force when information is substantial, dialogue is exhausted, and the situation is roleplayed out.

PROHIBITED CONDUCT

Killing and immediately reviving a player to invoke the New Life Rule.
Using lethal force as a first response with no attempt at dialogue.

OPERATIONAL EXAMPLE
Player A's plans are overheard due to their own carelessness. Rather than addressing it through roleplay, they kill and revive the witness and declare their memory wiped. This is a violation — dialogue was required first.
ADMINISTRATIVE REASONING
The New Life Rule is a roleplay mechanic, not an exploit. Abusing it to erase player knowledge undermines fair play. Staff retain full discretion to act on violations.
Clarification 6.6-A - Destroying Walls and Doors Without /raid
ADMINISTRATIVE INTERPRETATION

DIRECTIVE 6.6 - Raids
RECORD:
6.6-A

STATUS:
ACTIVE

ISSUED:
July 22, 2026

AUTHORIZED BY:
COO
SUBMITTED QUESTION
Can you destroy walls or doors of a faction base without using /raid?
OFFICIAL CLARIFICATION
Yes, with substantial reasoning. During active conflict, whether a declared war or an active escalation at a faction's base, destroying walls or doors to reach enemies sheltering behind them is permitted. Crossing through into the base is what constitutes a raid and requires /raid. Player-built extensions of a base are not protected and can be attacked, destroyed, and entered without /raid.
PERMITTED CONDUCT

Destroying walls or doors during active conflict to reach enemies sheltering behind them.
Attacking, destroying, and entering player-built extensions of a base without /raid.

PROHIBITED CONDUCT

Destroying walls or doors without substantial roleplay reasoning or active conflict.
Crossing into a faction's primary base through a destroyed tile without an approved /raid.

OPERATIONAL EXAMPLE
NCR and Legion are in active conflict at the Legion gate. Legion members retreat behind the wall. NCR may destroy the wall to engage them, but the moment NCR steps through into Legion territory, /raid is required.
ADMINISTRATIVE REASONING
The /raid requirement protects factions from unsanctioned incursions into their primary base. Destroying infrastructure during active conflict is a natural part of warfare and does not by itself constitute a raid.


Clarification NUMBER — TITLE
ADMINISTRATIVE INTERPRETATION

DIRECTIVE NUMBER — RULE NAME
RECORD:
NUMBER

STATUS:
ACTIVE

ISSUED:
DATE

AUTHORIZED BY:
Project Leadership
SUBMITTED QUESTION
Enter the question or situation being clarified.
OFFICIAL CLARIFICATION
Enter the official interpretation of the rule.
PERMITTED CONDUCT

Enter permitted conduct.
Enter another permitted example.

PROHIBITED CONDUCT

Enter prohibited conduct.
Enter another prohibited example.

OPERATIONAL EXAMPLE
Enter an example showing how this clarification applies during a round.
ADMINISTRATIVE REASONING
Explain the purpose and intent of the clarification.


ARCHIVED CLARIFICATIONS
Clarifications that are replaced or no longer active should be moved to this section rather than deleted.
Use the following status labels:
ACTIVE — Current official interpretation
REVISED — Updated by a newer interpretation
SUPERSEDED — Replaced and no longer enforced
ARCHIVED — Preserved for historical reference
VAULT-TEC ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY

These records represent official interpretations of the Misfits: Nuclear Wasteland rules.




Project leadership retains final authority in all rule interpretations.




VAULT-TEC NOTICE: A BETTER COMMUNITY THROUGH ORDER.