Rule Clarifications
```mediawiki
╔══════════════════════════════════════╗
VAULT-TEC RULE CLARIFICATIONS
ACCESS LEVEL: PUBLIC
╚══════════════════════════════════════╝
> Accessing administrative records...
> Loading directive interpretations...
> Verifying authorization signatures...
> Synchronizing clarification archive...
STATUS: RECORDS AVAILABLE
MISFITS: NUCLEAR WASTELAND
RULE CLARIFICATION ARCHIVE
This page contains official interpretations of server rules.
Clarifications explain how a rule applies to specific situations.
Clarifications do not replace the rules.
Players are expected to follow both the written rule and its official interpretations.
CLARIFICATION INDEX
ACTIVE CLARIFICATIONS
Clarification 6.10-A — Witnessing Thievery
ADMINISTRATIVE INTERPRETATION
DIRECTIVE 6.10 — THIEVERY
RECORD:
6.10-A
STATUS:
ACTIVE
ISSUED:
July 21, 2026
AUTHORIZED BY: Project Leadership
SUBMITTED QUESTION
Can someone immediately attack a player who is seen carrying equipment belonging to another faction?
OFFICIAL CLARIFICATION
Seeing someone carrying faction equipment does not automatically prove that the item was stolen.
A player who directly witnesses an item being stolen may treat the theft as escalation. A third party who did not witness the theft must confront the suspected thief and establish escalation before using lethal force.
PERMITTED CONDUCT
- Defending yourself after directly catching someone stealing from you.
- Ordering someone to return property when ownership is disputed.
- Escalating after a suspected thief refuses a clear demand to return stolen property.
PROHIBITED CONDUCT
- Shooting someone solely because they possess another faction's equipment.
- Assuming an item was stolen without witnessing the theft.
- Joining a firefight without understanding why the conflict began.
OPERATIONAL EXAMPLE
A Brotherhood Paladin catches a wastelander removing ammunition directly from the Paladin's inventory. The theft itself creates escalation, and the Paladin may respond.
An NCR trooper sees a wastelander carrying an NCR rifle near a battlefield. The trooper did not witness a theft and must first confront the wastelander rather than immediately opening fire.
ADMINISTRATIVE REASONING
This clarification distinguishes direct knowledge from assumption. It allows victims to protect their property while preventing uncertain circumstances from being used as justification for immediate lethal force.
Clarification NUMBER — TITLE
ADMINISTRATIVE INTERPRETATION
DIRECTIVE NUMBER — RULE NAME
RECORD:
NUMBER
STATUS:
ACTIVE
ISSUED:
DATE
AUTHORIZED BY: Project Leadership
SUBMITTED QUESTION
Enter the question or situation being clarified.
OFFICIAL CLARIFICATION
Enter the official interpretation of the rule.
PERMITTED CONDUCT
- Enter permitted conduct.
- Enter another permitted example.
PROHIBITED CONDUCT
- Enter prohibited conduct.
- Enter another prohibited example.
OPERATIONAL EXAMPLE
Enter an example showing how this clarification applies during a round.
ADMINISTRATIVE REASONING
Explain the purpose and intent of the clarification.
ARCHIVED CLARIFICATIONS
Clarifications that are replaced or no longer active should be moved to this section rather than deleted.
Use the following status labels:
- ACTIVE — Current official interpretation
- REVISED — Updated by a newer interpretation
- SUPERSEDED — Replaced and no longer enforced
- ARCHIVED — Preserved for historical reference
VAULT-TEC ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY
These records represent official interpretations of the Misfits: Nuclear Wasteland rules.
Project leadership retains final authority in all rule interpretations.
VAULT-TEC NOTICE: A BETTER COMMUNITY THROUGH ORDER.
```